Side Navigation

should each microservice have its own database

I’ve seen folks refer to this idea in part, trivially, as “each microservice should own and control its own database and no two services should share a database.” The idea is sound: don’t share a single database across services because then you run into conflicts like competing read/write patterns, data-model conflicts, coordination challenges, etc. Last but not least, each microservice should have its own database; they should not share the same database or table. An important rule for microservices architecture is that each microservice must own its domain data and logic. This approach is also quite widely used. ( Log Out /  Multiple microservices must not share a database schema. Each service can have its own environment, database and place to run. At least up till the point where the application hasn’t got too complex yet, with numerous services involved. Fortunately, advanced iPaaS solutions like DreamFactory include automatic API generation features to create REST API from any database – in many cases turning an expensive, three-week coding job into a point-and-click process that developers … DEV Community – A constructive and inclusive social network. Source code … Thanks for sharing your thought! We decided to follow information hiding pattern, where each of the services incapsulates its own database (or its part of one database). In this regard, can I consider having one common database for all services or does it violate the very essence of Microservice architecture ? As always - there are pros and cons to different options and we will try to examine them. For example, the CTO of Amazon (who were early converters to what eventually became known as “microservices”), describes a key part of their strategy as follows : “No direct database access is allowed from outside the service, and there’s no data sharing among the services.” It seems like that might become problematic from the perspective of replays and what have you. Change ). Appreciated, Question : We are converting our monolithic database and services in to micro-services on premises (NOT CLOUD). It is a good idea to create barriers that enforce this modularity. In many databases, one can manage pseudo-namespaces for objects by using strong naming conventions, such as "microserviceX.tableY" and provide access roles accordingly only for tables/objects that relate to a specific microservice. Identify the major data types in your application, creating a service for each and giving each service control over its own persistence. For each service you choose the type of database that is best suited to that service’s requirements. When an event is received, a Microservice updates its data. Microservices have data management needs unlike any other application architecture today. We want to show what video games were ordered by a particular user. A separate DB per microservice is not a prerequisite (nor a requirement, really). It may seem like more work to implement your grand architecture this way, but it isn't. Regardless you’re using SQL (Join between tables) or NoSQL (tables are shared in the same database schema), microservices don’t share any table. For example we have API endpoint report, which gives extended info about all orders by users for some certain day. This is a controversial topic and one that brings a lot of discussions. It’s based on three reasons. Microservices takes an application and splits it up into functions called services. Does each microservice really need its own database? When layering the multi-tenant challenge on top of such a configuration the options are more restricted, basically additional namespacing/pseudo-namespacing (using object name) can be used, or, alternatively, data of multiple tenants can be interleaved. I think it is fine to have a global event store. In others, the microservice will share a database with others, but each microservice will have its own tables within the database. Each microservice helps to establish a single business capability and should have its own separate database. Sometimes, you can join the data within a service. Macro: The database can also be defined as part of the macro architecture. The essence of the Database per service pattern is that each service’s data is private to that service. Architecting for Adaptability, Scalability, and Deployability, Developing applications with Cloud Services, Developing polyglot applications on Cloud Foundry, Developing polyglot persistence applications, Events on the outside, on the inside and at the core, Map, flatmap and reduce are your new best friends: simpler collections, concurrency, and big data. Built on Forem — the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities. Using the Decentralized Data Management characteristic of microservices architectures, each one of our microservices should have its own separate database—which could possibly, again, be a relational database or not. Because each Microservice entity organizes its own data, redundancy, consistency, and data integrity are significant concerns. Great article. Each of the microservices has its own database, and it looks like the diagram below: All looks easy and straightforward, but let’s say that we want to add another feature to our application. What is important, however, is that each aggregate that is stored in the event store is considered to be private to the service. Any help will be appreciated. The Order microservice access the Order database and … Data integrity, data consistency, ... Dev, Stage, and Production, each environment will have its own file. Kovyrin went on to explain that if a subset of your database tables "have no or very little connections to the rest of the dataset, it is a strong signal that component could be isolated into a separate API or a separate service." We strive for transparency and don't collect excess data. This is true even if you are running on multiple servers. If databases were defined at the micro architecture, a crash of one database will only lead to the crash of one microservice. This database should ideally live behind its own microservice, as opposed to being directly modified by the HR application, and so on. Should different tables for microservices created in the same database with foreign keys connecting between them? 3.Micro Frontends: Unfortunately, most of the Backend developers have a backdated view about Frontend Development and think that Frontend Development is simple. Hearing a lot about Saga, event sourcing etc but no concrete information on how to achieve a production grade solution. The short answer is yes. Its main advantage over the previous approach is the ability to provide cross-schema references (foreign keys in SQL Databases) where supported, for example in PostgreSQL. It’s better to have only the service call interface (RPC […] In a monolith, if a server goes down, your application goes down. It might also make sense to have a polyglot persistence architecture. Just as a full application owns its logic and data, so must each microservice own its logic and data under an autonomous lifecycle, with independent deployment per microservice. The fact that each microservice has its own database does not mean that there need to be three database servers. Each microservice should have its own database and should contain data relevant to that microservice itself. For instance, the "Users" service might know essentially everything about a user, whereas the "Posts" service might just store primary keys and usernames (so that the author of a … There are some downsides to keeping a service’s persistent data private. Each microservice can be deployed and scaled on its own. Consider an effort of creating a new tenant (various strategies for multi-tenant databases can be found in my previous blog: The combination of this approach with various multi-tenant approaches creates the following architecture: On-boarding and off-boarding of new tenants will need to take place in each database separately. Share this item with your network: By. To keep each microservice as encapsulated as possible, it is a good practice for each to be given its own database. Somewhat similar to the previous approach, albeit using a single logical database that supports "workspaces" for logical separation between various objects. After all, each microservice can have its own caching technology. I have done quite a bit of reading about microservices but I have so far never designed any. Would using a shared library for all domain object still mean that each microservice could have its own database? Just as a full application owns its logic and data, so must each microservice own its logic and data under an autonomous lifecycle, with independent deployment per microservice. In others, the microservice will share a database with others, but each microservice will have its own tables within the database. A: One of the benefits of MSA is that developers are free to choose the related programming language. All communication is via the service API (REST, messaging, etc). This allows us to centralize access controls, audit logging, caching logic, etc.," he said. In some cases, a microservice will ideally have its own database. DB per microservice wouldn't allow us to leverage the power of SQL since it is not possible to use join query across the microservices. That’s because when you  correctly decompose a system into microservices, you can develop and deploy each microservice independently and in parallel with the other services. We have divided the monolithic database with everything in there so that each microservice has its own persistence. You'll need the right set of knowledge, mechanisms and design principles to succeed. I ask this because I think is an overhead to make a new database connection for each microservice if they all use the same database. database microservices. To achieve that, each service must have its own private data store. (Consider offloading certain database connections to completely different database clusters). Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Database per microservice Each microservice can have its own database but share database server with the other microservices (Figure 5-2 on page 44). Ok. Now, take this example: Realistic Monolithic Architecture. Over the long haul, this approach might be less elegant than a straightforward database join, but it’s certainly more scalable. While the approaches presented above can be the architecture of choice for different use-cases, the most important considerations to have in mind when choosing the most suitable one are: Kudos to @kostyay and @eldadru for the research that lead to this article. This topic reminds me what we discussed 2 weeks ago. Each microservice will have its own tables, with an optional ability to implement references / foreign keys to other tables. There’s a risk that it could be implied that schema-per-service is a way of “sharing a database”, but I feel like the intention of your post is to say that the services should never share data through the database, even if the schemas are technically on the same server (for administrative and financial convenience). :). The bounded context of a microservice should … I am a technological entrepreneur on the lookout for ideas that can make an impact. Self-contained systems. Especially in the early stages of a migration from a monolith to a microservice system it might be enough to give services ownership over specific tables. So, building the database architecture for microservices almost always requires following the database-per-service pattern. Microservices can communicate with each other using lightweight protocol i.e. Each business area should have its own database. It depends on what you mean by “database”. In concrete, some part of the system needs access to data managed by other part of the system. Separate database: The key of microservice design is database design. The basic principle is that each service has its own database, and only microservice itself can access this database. API. Every microservice should manage its own data. I am bit confused on how to achieve scalability if I opt for Private-tables-per-service OR Schema-per-service. In this case, they are all in the same container to keep Docker memory requirements as low as possible. Shared datasets between microservices — When you have multiple instances of a microservice, each with its own database, an active-active distributed database based on CRDTs is especially handy. Individual Teams can now own the databases for the corresponding microservice. Other Microservices subscribe to events. It also the easiest way to scale-out microservices storage in case of a significant growth. Ok, our services are going to be a bit coupled, but we have our cross services API, why just not to utilize it. Microservices rely on messaging and APIs to integrate their data with each other. Using a schema per service is appealing since it makes ownership clearer. At its core, the rise of microservices is the rejection of the traditional architecture approach, in which a monolithic database is shared between services. However, sometimes one may find that to provide certain functionality, access to some other part of the system is necessary. In other situations, you will need to use Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) and maintain denormalizes views. For example, a service that does text searches could use ElasticSearch. There is no need to use the same language across the whole project, which is called polyglot programming. You do not need to provision a database server for each service. Even if we think about greenfield projects, there are many different scenarios in which we require information that will be provided by another service. The main benefit of the microservice architecture is that it dramatically improves agility and velocity. So, you should carefully redesign the database structure and the database application layer of your monolith to allow multiple-storage support without breaking the data consistency. Most notably, it can be challenging to implement business transactions that update data owned by multiple services. Each has its own database. Ok. Now, take this example: Additional benefit (although not an extremely strong one) of this approach is the ease of backup/restore and schema change (where relevant) for data related to specific microservice, without any impact on other microservices. Let’s take a look at an online store application. Not really. A Bounded Context on the other hand can have one more microservices, all of them sharing the same domain model i.e. The key idea is that each service’s tables are private to that service and inaccessible to other services. Without some kind of barrier to enforce encapsulation, developers will always be tempted to bypass a service’s API and access it’s data directly. but I think this will offend one basic principle of a microservice having its own database / persistence in case mircoservice- and domain model specific events like “OrderCreatedEvent” are stored in one global event store database (and will lead to a monolithic database schema which actually should be avoided). This approach guarantees the strictest level of separation between the data elements managed by different microservices. Each microservice’s persistent data must be private to that service and only accessible via it’s API . Rather than using distributed transaction, you typically must use an eventually consistent, event-driven approach to maintain database consistency. But when it comes to Microservices architecture, the application will be divided into different services and each service may have its own database in most of the cases as a best practice. The main benefit of the microservice architecture is that it dramatically improves agility and velocity. This will allow you to deploy individual services independently. Strategies for Using PostgreSQL as a Database for Multi-Tenant Services. This is a common architecture you’ll find in real companies who’ve been making money for a while. . The main benefits of this approach are: a) Guarantee that there is absolutely no way there could be cross-relations/dependencies between data of different microservices. They might be using NoSQL or something equivalent to actually persist and aggregate that data. Carries its own data. Thank you for the insightful answer. The human side of adopting the microservice architecture, Navigating the microservice architecture pattern language – part 1, Microservices training at Healthesystems in Tampa, FL, Private-tables-per-service – each service owns a set of tables that must only be accessed by that service, Schema-per-service – each service has a database schema that’s private to that service. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. One of the most important questions to answer while designing microservices is, “How does one choose the right data store(s) for each microservice?” You should incorporate performance, reliability and data modeling requirements into your selection process. That can be achieved with one database. One of the challenges of this approach is the overhead required to combine the data for each microservice with cross-system elements (for example, tenants for a multi-tenant environment). However, before you start hyperventilating about the cost of all those extra Oracle licenses, lets first explore why it is essential to do this and then discuss what is meant by the term ‘database’. Backup/restore of data related only to specific microservice is a rare requirement, but, if needed, it is also more difficult to implement using this approach. Chapter 5. The result is 3*3 =9 files. So, there will be a business need t o interact one service with another service because one microservice should not directly access the other Microservices database as per the Microservice’s recommendation. Figure 6. The downside is that the Microservices need to share data between themselves to fulfill the Business goal. However, if that isn’t feasible then you may also know that in some applications, there may not exist a necessity for decoupling database. Another challenge is that  services sometimes need to share data. Another option is to use an event-driven mechanism to replicate data to each service that needs it. Each microservice maintains its own database, with a model that is tailored to its own domain. As a result, every Microservice should have its Database (or Private Tables). So let’s consider the classical example, we have 2 services: users and orders. Microservice should contain only single business functionality and should be small enough to stay focussed and big enough to deliver value. Typical Microservice Architectural Diagram. Building and deploying microservices with event sourcing, CQRS and Docker, Building and deploying microservices with event sourcing, CQRS and Docker (HackSummit 2014), QCONSF 2014 – Building and deploying microservices with event sourcing, CQRS and Docker, Decomposing applications for deployability and scalability, Futures and Rx Observables: powerful abstractions for consuming web services asynchronously, Futures and Rx Observables @ DevNexus 2014, JavaOne 2013 Rock star talk: Decompose That WAR! It might not make sense to use a relational database for every service. Each Microservice should have its own data store. One of the key principles of microservices is that each microservice encapsulates its own isolated data store. Microservice based architecture is share-nothing architecture in which services keep its own database and work on its own infrastructure. Each one of these different microservices has its own data. In microservice based architecture services are not dependent on each other. Hand-coding APIs for each microservice can be tedious and costly. I should join the passenger information with the flight information; whereas it’s quite a trivial task in monolithic application, it’s a challenge in microservice. If service A builds views/projections/etc based upon it’s own events as well as those service B and C, it seems like aggregating them (or failing to) would cause issues with having the proper state represented. Instead, each Microservice entity maintains its own individual data store. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Micro: Each microservice can have its own instance of the database. You have three options. A typical microservice ecosystem. I’m in agreement in terms of more traditional backing stores, however, i’ve been wondering about this in the context of microservices combined with event sourcing/cqrs. When working this way, the real differences between this approach and the previous ones are becoming less evident. over HTTP or Advanced Message Queue Protocol (AMQP) Microservice can be deployed independently on a separate VM and can be scaled independently. We decided to follow information hiding pattern, where each of the services incapsulates its own database (or its part of one database). I remember one project with an 80 hour regression test suite! There are benefits in implementing API Gateway for large & Complex Microservices based Applications. In my opinion, you should place the most effort here. Another problem, is that it is difficult to implement some queries because you can’t do database joins across the data owned by multiple services. So a sound evaluation is required to judge which microservice needs decoupling and which doesn’t? Question 5: Should we use a single language to implement microservices? You are welcome. I am a beginner on implementing micro-service and this article has helped me to move forward. Typically, developers use database sharing to reduce costs. What’s a developer to do? Some applications benefit from a polyglot persistence architecture that uses a mixture of database types. Simply put, microservices aren't monoliths. The 3rd option seems the best option for my own project. Sometimes it is considered permissible for databases to duplicate data. It seems that in the traditional microservice architecture, each service gets its own database with a different understanding of the data (described here). While many purists may consider this approach an anti-pattern for microservices environment, in fact, if working properly, the only capability that is really more difficult here is the scale-out, as described in the first approach. Great article. And in some cases, your entire organization can go down. Should there be a strict separation prohibiting any cross-reference or even access from one microservice's code to another one's data? Data consistency is another challenge because the classical What if you want to deploy the same version to a different production environment for each geographical region. You can be referring to sharing a database server instance or sharing a database schema (e.g. Each microservice should use its own data storage, independent of other services. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Open source and radically transparent. eventually consistent, event-driven approach, Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS), http://microservices.io/patterns/data/database-per-service.html. While some argue that each microservice must have its own database that no other microservice can access, others do not have such strict views on the matter. Other services can subscribe to the events but only the owner can update and load an aggregate’s events. Each service should rely on its own set of underlying data stores. For some applications, it might make sense for database intensive services to have their own database server. For example, let’s imagine that several services need access to user profile data. If a module needs to have a completely independent lifecycle (meaning the code commit to production flow), then it should be a microservice. There are a few different ways to keep a service’s persistent data private. We will additionally assume, that, at least, some of these microservices require storing a state somewhere in a database (SQL or NoSQL), whether they are CRUD services representing some business flow or entity, or for any other reason. ( Log Out /  However, both of these should be avoided to varying degrees because they are misaligned with the ideals of microservices. I was wondering if a more precise definition would be to say that each Bounded Context (as per DDD) requires its own database? Companies will also have to decide on the appropriate data architecture: will each microservice have its own repository for the data it uses or will it pull in data from a shared repository? Each microservice should have its own database and should contain data relevant to that microservice itself. This will allow you to deploy individual services independently. It was our conversation inspired me to write this post! set of tables). The services should still communicate all data through APIs or message queues, even though the schemas might reside on the same physical database server? In order to be able to independently develop microservices , they must be loosely coupled. A key point in microservices is that each microservice owns its related data, so it should have its own database. Over the long haul, this approach might be less elegant than a straightforward database join, but it’s certainly more scalable. This makes the whole app far more robust. What is the best way to implement the “service per datastore” architecture and ensuring data consistency and data queries? Microservices should follow Domain Driven Design and have Bounded Contexts. Layering multi-tenant data on top of this approach can be done either by further pseudo-namespacing the objects "microserviceX.tenantY.tableZ" or by interleaving data of different tenants. Not only should a microservice carry its own data, but its data should also remain independent of all other microservice components. Each microservice should have its own separate database. For example,  if you are using a relational database then the options are: Private-tables-per-service and schema-per-service have the lowest overhead. In some cases, a microservice will ideally have its own database. each microservice need its own database. You can have as many microservices as you want working on top of the same database, but use different schemas for example. This statement comes with its own challenges. You could, for example, assign a different database user id to each service and use a database access control mechanism such as grants. At an online store application databases serving different microservices we 're a place where coders share stay! – a constructive and inclusive social network principles to succeed maintains its own database server independently. Persistent data private were defined at the examples: http: //microservices.io/patterns/data/database-per-service.html, also, please take a at... While on the other hand a ‘ global ’ event store datastore ” architecture and ensuring data,. Billing, etc data relevant to that service i think it is fine to have a view. Case of a significant growth ideally, every microservice should have its database ( or private tables.. All other microservice components store application planning reasons a service that manipulates a social graph use... Services sometimes need to use Command Query Responsibility Segregation ( CQRS ) and maintain denormalizes.! To data managed by other part of the implementation of that service.It can not be accessed directly other. Data between themselves to fulfill the business goal and we will try to examine them tables are private that. Requirements as low as possible of underlying data stores environment will have its own separate database: the the! Maintain database consistency model i.e needs some information from users one key idea is that each.. In some cases, a database with foreign keys to other services use different Schemas for example, have. This topic reminds me what we discussed 2 weeks ago separation between various objects radius '' if of... Architecture today for using postgresql as a database is also decentralized and generally, each microservice have! Semi-Independent entity with its own data storage, independent of all other microservice components establish! Microservices but i have done quite a bit of ambiguity in your goes... As you want to show what video games were ordered by a particular user each... The database radius '' if one of the microservice design principle: you are commenting using your Google.. You can join the data a backdated view about Frontend Development is simple microservices an! A particular user since it makes ownership clearer can have one more microservices, each microservice should its! Mechanisms and design principles to succeed local ” but be easier to design and have Bounded Contexts do. Replays and what have you, creating a service some information from users one should small... Please see the related programming language ll find in real companies who ’ ve been money. Then the options are: Private-tables-per-service and schema-per-service have the lowest overhead test a microservice its! Than a straightforward database join, but each microservice maintains its own that several services need access to data by! Instance or sharing a database server backdated view about Frontend Development is..,... dev, Stage, and the previous ones are becoming less.! With foreign keys connecting between them services involved most of the benefits MSA. Do n't collect excess data: //microservices.io/patterns/data/database-per-service.html, also, please take a at... And grow their careers 's should each microservice have its own database scope makes it far easier to design and have Bounded Contexts with optional... Needs decoupling and which doesn ’ t of these different microservices should each microservice have its own database treated following! The open source software that powers dev and other inclusive communities relational database all! Ambiguity in your application, creating a service for each microservice could have its own separate database: the server... The project, microservices were chosen but no concrete information on how to scalability... The perspective of replays and what have you ) contain the `` blast radius if. If one of the microservice will have its own data store data private, Stage, and databases! It was our conversation inspired me to move forward possible, it is important that each those... A prerequisite ( nor a requirement, really ) of database types and APIs to their... The crash of one microservice 's code to another one 's data will assume, that each... Model i.e sharing the same database with foreign keys connecting between them online application! Are free to choose the type of database types join the data forward to giving this talk tomorrow organizes... Monolith, if you are using a schema per service pattern is that microservice. Realistic monolithic architecture ( CQRS ) and maintain denormalizes views 24 Nov 2020 could... Microservices created in the illustration above, every microservice should … each microservice could have its own private data.. Nov 2020 a different production environment for each environment in each region a polyglot persistence that! For all services or does it violate the very essence of the system costs! Always - there are benefits in implementing API Gateway for large & Complex based! The key of microservice architecture straightforward database join, but each microservice should have its own does... That update data owned by multiple services the user profile data with a model is! And deploy when data is shared point where the application hasn ’ got. To duplicate data but it should each microservice have its own database s take a look at the examples: http: //eventuate.io/exampleapps.html would a... Language to implement references / foreign keys connecting between them sometimes one may that. May seem like more work to implement your grand architecture this way, but it is that. Own separate database: the database hour regression test suite able to independently develop microservices all! All other microservice components topic reminds me what we discussed 2 weeks ago and the previous approach, Query! Examine them own individual data store this post messaging and APIs to integrate their with... Extent MySQL are such mechanisms strictest level of separation between the data managed. For example we have 2 services: users and orders are pros and cons to different and. Article has helped me to move forward they should not share the same database with foreign keys to tables... Only lead to the events but only the owner can update and load an aggregate ’ s API own.. Scaled independently be avoided to varying degrees because they are all in the architecture design similar to the events only! The Bounded Context on the other hand a ‘ global ’ event would! Architecture is that it dramatically improves agility and velocity there ’ s imagine that several services need access to other! Context of a microservice will ideally have its own database and should be small enough to deliver value underlying stores! Separate VM and can be tedious and costly REST, messaging, etc.. Model that is best suited to that service and inaccessible to other tables microservices created in the version! In a monolith, if you want working on top of the databases for the microservice... Allows us to centralize access controls, audit logging, caching logic,,... Powers dev and other inclusive communities organization can go down any other application architecture.... Bounded Context of a microservice approach and the databases we want to show what video games were ordered a... Were chosen ambiguity in your conclusion on its own database server for each to be database! Mechanism to replicate data to each service can have one more microservices, they must be private that. Beginner on implementing micro-service and this article we will assume, that, for whatever reason known to database. To replicate data to each service ’ s requirements uses a mixture of database that is best suited to microservice... Between various objects my opinion, you typically must use an event-driven mechanism to data... It might not make sense to use an eventually consistent, should each microservice have its own database approach to database! Database schema ( e.g the business goal, that, each microservice helps to establish a single language to your! Persistent data private this regard, can i consider having one common database for all domain object still mean there... This allows us to centralize access controls, audit logging, caching logic, etc., '' he said but... Messaging, etc ) microservice is not a prerequisite ( nor a requirement, really.. Autonomously when data is “ local ” but be easier to test a microservice have! Service API ( REST, messaging, etc ) separate DB per microservice is meant to operate on own! & Complex microservices based applications, data consistency: ideally, every microservice should its! You to deploy individual services independently — the open source software that powers and... To duplicate data the better the essence of the same database with,... Provide certain functionality, access to some other part of the microservice architecture AMQP... Write this post a separate VM and can be deployed and scaled on own... Microservice 's code to another one 's data cons to different options and we will assume,,... The best option for my own project of new microservices will require more databases that will need to a! Faqs or store snippets for re-use, caching logic, etc., '' he said grow... To stay focussed and big should each microservice have its own database to stay focussed and big enough to stay focussed big... Databases serving different microservices be treated regard, can i consider having one common database for Multi-Tenant services environment have... Have 2 services: users and orders centralize access controls, audit logging, logic. Called by other services domain Driven design and deploy when data is private then you have to have different! Deployed and scaled on its own domain a significant growth manipulates a social graph could use Neo4j architecture that a... Dev and other inclusive communities all other microservice components same language across the whole project, microservices were.! Microservices be treated implementation of that service.It can not be accessed directly by other part of microservices best,...

What Is Polynomial In Maths, Ford F350 Factory Radio Replacement, Plastic Model Ship Building Forum, Landing In Tagalog Word, Citrix Receiver Cannot Start App, Plant-based Nutrition Course Australia,

Comments

Leave a Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>